Template:Infobox: Revision history

7 August 2006

• curprev 10:3010:30, 7 August 2006 >16@r m 1,141 bytes +23 +fr undo

18 June 2006

• curprev 17:0617:06, 18 June 2006 >Circeus 1,118 bytes −11 sortkey undo

13 June 2006

• curprev 13:0713:07, 13 June 2006 >Daviddecraene 1,129 bytes +2 sorry, accidently changed undo
• curprev 13:0613:06, 13 June 2006 >Daviddecraene 1,127 bytes −1 →Usage undo

10 May 2006

• curprev 22:5422:54, 10 May 2006 >CBDunkerson 1,128 bytes −37 Unprotecting - Based on discussion this page should be used to demonstrate currently common infobox template techniques of all kinds. undo
• curprev 22:5322:53, 10 May 2006 >CBDunkerson m 1,165 bytes 0 Unprotected Template:Infobox: Unprotecting since consensus seems to be established undo

21 April 2006

• curprev 20:0920:09, 21 April 2006 >CBDunkerson 1,165 bytes +23 Adding 'noinclude' tags since some pages are actually transcluding this one. undo
• curprev 20:0720:07, 21 April 2006 >CBDunkerson 1,142 bytes +14 Adding protection template. See Talk page. undo
• curprev 20:0620:06, 21 April 2006 >CBDunkerson m 1,128 bytes 0 Protected Template:Infobox: Contents of page still disputed. Restoring protection and instituting straw poll. [edit=sysop:move=sysop] undo
• curprev 19:2819:28, 21 April 2006 >Netoholic 1,128 bytes −419 rmv conditionals. this is a _basic_ template for new template editors. Conditionals are not _basic_ tools. undo
• curprev 08:5008:50, 21 April 2006 >Marknew 1,547 bytes +610 Restored Usage instructions (none available on the talk page) undo

19 April 2006

• curprev 17:1217:12, 19 April 2006 >Marknew m 937 bytes −27 attempt number 2... undo
• curprev 17:1117:11, 19 April 2006 >Marknew 964 bytes −10 Replace data5 "hack" with something clearer that *appears* to work in the same way. undo
• curprev 15:0915:09, 19 April 2006 >The editor1 974 bytes 0 No edit summary undo
• curprev 15:0815:08, 19 April 2006 >The editor1 974 bytes −27 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:5914:59, 19 April 2006 >The editor1 1,001 bytes +81 No edit summary undo
• curprev 03:4303:43, 19 April 2006 >Freakofnurture 920 bytes −662 cleanup, convert qif to #if: undo

18 April 2006

• curprev 23:0023:00, 18 April 2006 >CBDunkerson 1,582 bytes −36 Removed protection - assume #if: has resolved the dispute undo
• curprev 22:5922:59, 18 April 2006 >CBDunkerson m 1,618 bytes 0 Unprotected Template:Infobox: Unprotecting - hopefully #if: has resolved the dispute by superceding both methods undo

19 February 2006

• curprev 08:2808:28, 19 February 2006 >Jtkiefer 1,618 bytes +36 protected undo
• curprev 08:1808:18, 19 February 2006 >Locke Cole 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - part of that compromise was placing a link to it from here, which you and Trodel rejected undo
• curprev 08:0908:09, 19 February 2006 >Netoholic 1,095 bytes −487 rvt per compromise, which create Template:Infobox Conditionals undo
• curprev 07:2007:20, 19 February 2006 >Locke Cole 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - it's only complicated until editors see it in action and get a chance to learn it, via this sample infobox undo
• curprev 05:4305:43, 19 February 2006 >Netoholic 1,095 bytes −487 rvt to less complex code undo

16 February 2006

• curprev 05:0705:07, 16 February 2006 >Locke Cole m 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - compromise was dismissed by Trodel and Netoholic, reverting to original undo
• curprev 04:5404:54, 16 February 2006 >Netoholic 1,095 bytes −487 removing complex code, per agreement on talk by several contributors undo

14 February 2006

• curprev 05:3205:32, 14 February 2006 >Locke Cole m 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - it is for me if it is for you undo
• curprev 05:2005:20, 14 February 2006 >Netoholic 1,095 bytes −487 reverting this "at will" is not an option. undo

13 February 2006

• curprev 22:3722:37, 13 February 2006 >Locke Cole 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - then it appears we don't have a compromise anymore; I'll be reverting this at will since you seem unwilling to compromise undo
• curprev 18:2118:21, 13 February 2006 >Trödel 1,095 bytes −487 The compromise is linked to on the talk page - wikipedians who can't find it on the talk page should not be using an advance technique like that undo

12 February 2006

• curprev 04:4404:44, 12 February 2006 >Locke Cole 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - the compromise included linking to the advanced template from this template, but that was rejected undo
• curprev 04:3704:37, 12 February 2006 >Netoholic 1,095 bytes −487 we had a compromise (create alternate advanced template), see talk undo

11 February 2006

• curprev 05:0905:09, 11 February 2006 >Locke Cole m 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - I looked at the talk page, I see nothing new; the only compromise there that was supported has been reverted by you and Trodel undo
• curprev 03:1803:18, 11 February 2006 >Netoholic 1,095 bytes −234 we had a compromise, see talk undo
• curprev 03:1703:17, 11 February 2006 >Netoholic 1,329 bytes −253 we had a compromise, see talk undo
• curprev 02:1902:19, 11 February 2006 >Locke Cole m 1,582 bytes +253 rvt - yes, it is very confusing WP:OWN undo

10 February 2006

• curprev 13:3313:33, 10 February 2006 >Trödel 1,329 bytes −253 this latest change is very confusing undo

6 February 2006

• curprev 08:0808:08, 6 February 2006 >Locke Cole m 1,582 bytes +487 rvt - have it your way, I'm not compromising anymore undo
• curprev 08:0708:07, 6 February 2006 >Netoholic 1,095 bytes −134 Category is good enough. put "see also" on talk, if needed undo
• curprev 08:0208:02, 6 February 2006 >Locke Cole 1,229 bytes +97 rvt - sigh undo
• curprev 07:5907:59, 6 February 2006 >Trödel 1,132 bytes −97 including a link here is no better than explaining it here - it still encourages new users to use conditionals - when they should be discouraged from using them undo

5 February 2006

• curprev 15:5415:54, 5 February 2006 >Marknew 1,229 bytes +97 Added link to Template:Infobox Conditionals undo

4 February 2006

• curprev 08:2608:26, 4 February 2006 >WGFinley 1,132 bytes −450 rv - and still no consensus to do it undo
• curprev 06:3906:39, 4 February 2006 >Crotalus horridus 1,582 bytes +450 Revert - see Template talk:Infobox for a lengthy justification. undo
• curprev 06:2106:21, 4 February 2006 >WGFinley m 1,132 bytes −450 rv undo
• curprev 06:1606:16, 4 February 2006 >Crotalus horridus 1,582 bytes +450 um... what guidelines for meta-template usage? WP:AUM is simply an essay at this point. And for hiding empty rows, {{qif}} is the best we currently have. undo

3 February 2006

• curprev 20:0920:09, 3 February 2006 >WGFinley m 1,132 bytes −450 rv - this revision fails all guidelines for meta-template usage undo
• curprev 06:3306:33, 3 February 2006 >Crotalus horridus 1,582 bytes +450 Reversion to revision 37961367 using popups undo
• curprev 05:3705:37, 3 February 2006 >Netoholic 1,132 bytes −450 rvt, this is Infobox 101 undo
• curprev 05:3605:36, 3 February 2006 >Locke Cole m 1,582 bytes +450 rvt again, per talk; please pretend you two respect consensus undo